Rubric: Project-based learning video

Not presented.

Low performance: The group does not search for information in the appropriate sources. The information selected is of little relevance.

Needs improvement: The group only consults some of the appropriate sources. The information selected is not always relevant.

(Quite) good: The group consults many appropriate sources. The information selected is relevant.

Excellent: The groups consults appropiate sources. The information selected is appropriate and highly relevant.

Not presented.

Low performance: The discourse shows a poor understanding of basic concepts.

Needs improvement: The discourse shows a basic knowledge of some of the concepts previously worked in class.

(Quite) good: The discourse shows sufficient knowledge of all the concepts previously worked in class.

Excellent: The discourse shows an in-depth knowledge of all the concepts worked in class.

Not presented.

Low performance: The information is generally not well organised, there are errors that make it difficult to understand.

Needs improvement: The information is not always well organised.

(Quite) good: The information is fairly well organised.

Excellent: The information is very well organised.

Not presented.

Low performance: The content includes minor details and it has several mistakes in the facts.

Needs improvement: The content includes essential information about the topic, but it has 1-2 mistakes in the facts.

(Quite) good: The content includes basic kwoledgeabout the topic and it seems to be good.

Excellent: The content covers all the topics in depth with details and examples. The knowledge of the topic is excellent.

Not presented.

Low performance: Ideas are poorly developed and their connection is simple or unclear.

Needs improvement: The group develops and connects ideas in a sufficiently clear manner.

(Quite) good: The group develops and connects ideas quite clearly and with little ambiguity.

Excellent: The group develops and connects ideas clearly and unambiguously.

Not presented.

Low performance: The student's pronunciation makes the message barely understandable.

Needs improvement: The student's pronunciation makes the mesage difficult to understand.

(Quite) good: The student pronounces in a sufficiently intelligible manner, although it sometimes requires some effort.

Excellent: The student pronounces in a clearly understandable way, although he/she makes mistakes which occasionally affect communication.

Not presented.

Low performance: More than eight spelling or grammar mistakes.

Needs improvement: Six spelling or grammar mistakes.

(Quite) good: Four or fewer spelling or grammar mistakes.

Excellent: There are less than two mistakes in spelling or grammar.

Not presented.

Low performance: The student uses basic vocabulary poorly.

Needs improvement: The student uses basic vocabulary correctly, even if there is some inaccuracy or repetition.

(Quite) good: The student uses everyday vocabulary appropriately and introduces a few less common terms.

Excellent: The student uses a wide range of everyday vocabulary appropriately and introduces many less common terms.

Not presented.

Low performance: The presentation is not attractive. The audios, images and texts are inadequate and lacking in many aspects.

Needs improvement: The presentation is correct. The audios, images and texts are adequate, although there are some shortcomings.

(Quite) good: The presentation is attractive. Most of the audio, images and texts are relevant and facilitate the understanding of the discourse.

Excellent: The presentation is very attractive. The audios, images and texts are relevant and facilitate a good understanding of the discourse.

Not presented.

Low performance: The student showed little interest in the project and in helping other students.

Needs improvement: The student showed enought interest in the proyect and in helping other students.

(Quite) good: The student showed quite a lot of interest in the proyect and in helping other students.

Excellent: The student showed a high level of interest and in helping other students.

Not presented.

Low performance: The student has irregularly collaborated in the realisation of the project. The student has participated little in the project..

Needs improvement: The student collaborated in carrying out the different stages and participated in the project, although those contributions could be improved.

(Quite) good: The student has collaborated appropriately in the different stages and has participated in the project.

Excellent: The student has collaborated effectively in the implementation of the stages and has actively participated in the project.