Rubric: Rubric's model to assess argumentation

The purpose of this rubric is to be a model for raising specific tasks and their corresponding rubrics with which to assess the competence of scientific argumentation. (Traslated by Andy)

Quantitative Results:

1.Evidence

There is no evidence

There is some evidence, but inappropriate to support the conclusion

There is some evidence but not sufficient. Some evidence given might be inappropriate

There is enough evidence, and it is appropriate to support the conclusion

2.Justification

There is no justification

There is a justification, but it does not link the evidence with the conclusion

There is a justification that links the evidence with the conclusion. It repeats the evidence and/or some scientific ideas are included but they are insufficient

There is a justification that links the evidence with the conclusion. It includes the appropriate and sufficient scientific ideas

3.Conclusion/s

There is/are no conclusions

The conclusion is not right

The conclusion is right, but it bears scientific mistakes

The conclusion is right and bears no scientific mistakes

Public Rubrics