Rubric: Lipstick

Ejercicio sobre Argumentación científica

Quantitative Results:

1.Evidence
1
There is no evidence to support the answer
2
There is evidence to justify the conclusion, although it is not appropriate and does not support the conclusion
3
Provides some evidence, but not enough to justify that changing the recipe will result in obtaining a softer product
4
Provides enough and appropriate evidence to claim that changing the lipstick ingredients will result in a softer blend

2.Justification
1
There is no justification
2
Provides justification, but not appropriate to understand why changing the recipe will result in a softer blend
3
There is justification relating evidence to conclusion, but not enough to support the claim (that a softer blend will be achieved), as the lip gloss is soft because of the wax, which is the difference with the lipstick
4
Provides justification relating conclusion to evidence by stating that the lip gloss is soft due to its wax. Includes enough and appropriate scientific ideas for argumentation, although terms are not accurate or adequately used
5
Provides justification relating conclusion to evidence by stating that the lip gloss is soft due to its wax. Includes enough and appropriate scientific ideas for argumentation and terms are accurately used in a restrictive way

3.Conclusion
1
There is no conclusion
2
The conclusion is wrong, either because they think they cannot change the composition of ingredients or because the changes made are wrong
3
Despite the correct answer, conclusion is scientifically inaccurate or contains errors. For instance, wrong terms have been used
4
Provides a conclusion on changing the lipstick recipe to make it softer and is scientifically right and accurate, but does so in a tentative way (I think so, in my opinion…)
5
Provides a conclusion on changing the lipstick recipe to make it softer and is scientifically right and accurate, but does so in a restrictive way