Rubric: Lipstick
Ejercicio sobre Argumentación científica
Quantitative Results:
1.Evidence (33.33%)
1
There is no evidence to support the answer2
There is evidence to justify the conclusion, although it is not appropriate and does not support the conclusion 3
Provides some evidence, but not enough to justify that changing the recipe will result in obtaining a softer product4
Provides enough and appropriate evidence to claim that changing the lipstick ingredients will result in a softer blend2.Justification (33.33%)
1
There is no justification2
Provides justification, but not appropriate to understand why changing the recipe will result in a softer blend3
There is justification relating evidence to conclusion, but not enough to support the claim (that a softer blend will be achieved), as the lip gloss is soft because of the wax, which is the difference with the lipstick4
Provides justification relating conclusion to evidence by stating that the lip gloss is soft due to its wax. Includes enough and appropriate scientific ideas for argumentation, although terms are not accurate or adequately used5
Provides justification relating conclusion to evidence by stating that the lip gloss is soft due to its wax. Includes enough and appropriate scientific ideas for argumentation and terms are accurately used in a restrictive way3.Conclusion (33.33%)
1
There is no conclusion2
The conclusion is wrong, either because they think they cannot change the composition of ingredients or because the changes made are wrong3
Despite the correct answer, conclusion is scientifically inaccurate or contains errors. For instance, wrong terms have been used4
Provides a conclusion on changing the lipstick recipe to make it softer and is scientifically right and accurate, but does so in a tentative way (I think so, in my opinion…)5
Provides a conclusion on changing the lipstick recipe to make it softer and is scientifically right and accurate, but does so in a restrictive way