Rubric: Poster Video Evaluation - Scientific Dimension.
The items to be evaluated relate to the analysis of the scientific aspects of the poster video.Copy
1.Video poster scientific evaluation (100.00%)
1.1.Displaying the research problem. (19.23%)
1The research problem is not set.
2The research problem has a lack of clarity.
3Is clearly defined the research problem at the beginning of the poster video.
1.2.Displaying the research AIM. (15.38%)
1The research aim has not been defined.
2It does not present the research aim delimitation
3It specifies the research aim after the initial 30 seconds.
4It specifies the research aim and object on the initial 30 seconds.
1.3.It contributes according to the theoretical background and the state of the art in relation to the event theme. (15.38%)
1It does not have a clear contribution.
2It has a poor lay out in contrast to other similar projects.
3It possesses a scientific contribution or significantly enhances an idea to some degree.
1.4.Displaying the research METHOD. (15.38%)
1It is not specified the research scientific method.
2The specification of the scientific method has a lack of clarity.
3It clearly specifies the scientific method used.
1.5.Displaying the research RESULT. (15.38%)
1It is not presented or discussed.
2It is presented and discussed superficially.
3It is presented but it has lacks of discussion and argument in relation to theoretical basis and the state of the art.
4It is presented, discussed and argued in relation to the aim, theoretical basis and results.
1.6.Presenting the innovative nature of the research in video format. (15.38%)
1It does not present innovation.
2It enhances an existing idea to some degree.
3The idea is innovative or improves an existing idea significantly.
1.7.Evaluating for the poster awards video. (3.85%)
1I do not recommend it.
2It has the potential for being awarded.
3I recommend the award.