Rubric: Poster Video Evaluation - Scientific Dimension.

The items to be evaluated relate to the analysis of the scientific aspects of the poster video.

Copy

Quantitative Results:

1.Video poster scientific evaluation
1.1.Displaying the research problem.
1
The research problem is not set.
2
The research problem has a lack of clarity.
3
Is clearly defined the research problem at the beginning of the poster video.
1.2.Displaying the research AIM.
1
The research aim has not been defined.
2
It does not present the research aim delimitation
3
It specifies the research aim after the initial 30 seconds.
4
It specifies the research aim and object on the initial 30 seconds.
1.3.It contributes according to the theoretical background and the state of the art in relation to the event theme.
1
It does not have a clear contribution.
2
It has a poor lay out in contrast to other similar projects.
3
It possesses a scientific contribution or significantly enhances an idea to some degree.
1.4.Displaying the research METHOD.
1
It is not specified the research scientific method.
2
The specification of the scientific method has a lack of clarity.
3
It clearly specifies the scientific method used.
1.5.Displaying the research RESULT.
1
It is not presented or discussed.
2
It is presented and discussed superficially.
3
It is presented but it has lacks of discussion and argument in relation to theoretical basis and the state of the art.
4
It is presented, discussed and argued in relation to the aim, theoretical basis and results.
1.6.Presenting the innovative nature of the research in video format.
1
It does not present innovation.
2
It enhances an existing idea to some degree.
3
The idea is innovative or improves an existing idea significantly.
1.7.Evaluating for the poster awards video.
1
I do not recommend it.
2
It has the potential for being awarded.
3
I recommend the award.