Rubric: Poster Video Evaluation - Scientific Dimension.
The items to be evaluated relate to the analysis of the scientific aspects of the poster video.
Quantitative Results:
This element has a Badge
1.Video poster scientific evaluation (100.00%)
1.1.Displaying the research problem. (19.23%)
1
The research problem is not set.2
The research problem has a lack of clarity.3
Is clearly defined the research problem at the beginning of the poster video.1.2.Displaying the research AIM. (15.38%)
1
The research aim has not been defined.2
It does not present the research aim delimitation3
It specifies the research aim after the initial 30 seconds.4
It specifies the research aim and object on the initial 30 seconds.1.3.It contributes according to the theoretical background and the state of the art in relation to the event theme. (15.38%)
1
It does not have a clear contribution.2
It has a poor lay out in contrast to other similar projects.3
It possesses a scientific contribution or significantly enhances an idea to some degree.1.4.Displaying the research METHOD. (15.38%)
1
It is not specified the research scientific method.2
The specification of the scientific method has a lack of clarity.3
It clearly specifies the scientific method used.1.5.Displaying the research RESULT. (15.38%)
1
It is not presented or discussed.2
It is presented and discussed superficially.3
It is presented but it has lacks of discussion and argument in relation to theoretical basis and the state of the art.4
It is presented, discussed and argued in relation to the aim, theoretical basis and results. 1.6.Presenting the innovative nature of the research in video format. (15.38%)
1
It does not present innovation.2
It enhances an existing idea to some degree.3
The idea is innovative or improves an existing idea significantly.1.7.Evaluating for the poster awards video. (3.85%)
1
I do not recommend it.2
It has the potential for being awarded.3
I recommend the award.